Introductory Article on Solar Power in Business Parks

Posted on June 5th, by GBP in Administered Business Park, Afghanistan, Africa, Alabama, Albania, Alberta, Algeria, Americas, Andorra, Angola, Anguilla, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Arizona, Arkansas, Armenia, Aruba, Asia, Australia, Australia and New Zealand, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, Belize, Benin, Bermuda, Bhutan, Biotech Park, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Brazil, British Virgin Islands, Brunei Darussalam, Buildings & Supplies, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Business Park, California, Cambodia, Cameroon, Canada, Cape Verde, Caribbean, Cayman Islands, Central African Republic, Central America, Central Asia, Chad, Chile, China, Cleantech, Colombia, Colorado, Comoros, Congo, Connecticut, Costa Rica, Cote d'Ivoire, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Denmark, Djibouti, Doing business in..., Dominica, Dominican Republic, Eastern Africa, Eastern Asia, Eastern Europe, Economic Zone, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Electricity, Electronics, Energy, England, Environmental & Green, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Europe, Facilities, Falkland Islands (Malvinas), Finland, Florida, France, Free Trade Zone, French Guiana, Gabon, Gambia, Georgia, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Gibraltar, Greece, Green Business Management, Green Technology, Grenada, Guadeloupe, Guatemala, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Haiti, Hawaii, Honduras, Hong Kong, How to Green Your Business Park, Hungary, Iceland, Illinois, Incubator, India, Indiana, Indonesia, Industrial Park, Infrastructure, Iowa, Iran, Islamic Republic of, Iraq, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kentucky, Kenya, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lao People's Democratic Republic, Latvia, Lesotho, Liberia, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Logistics Park, Luxembourg, Macao, Madagascar, Malawi, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Malta, Manitoba, Manufacturing, Martinique, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mayotte, Mexico, Middle Africa, Minnesota, Moldova, Monaco, Mongolia, Montenegro, Montserrat, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nebraska, Nepal, Netherlands, Netherlands Antilles, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, Non-Administered Business Park, North Africa, North America, North Carolina, Northern Europe, Northern Ireland, Norway, Nova Scotia, Occupied Palestinian Territory, Oceania, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oman, Ontario, Operations, Pakistan, Panama, Paraguay, Park Classification-ALL, Pennsylvania, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Port, Portugal, Puerto Rico, Qatar, Regions - Global, Republic of Korea, Réunion, Romania, Roofing & Waterproofing, Rwanda, Saint Helena, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Martin (French part), Saint Pierre and Miquelon, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Saint-Barthélemy, San Marino, Sao Tome and Principe, Saudi Arabia, Science Park, Scotland, Senegal, Serbia, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Somalia, South Africa, South America, South-Eastern Asia, Southern Africa, Southern Asia, Southern Europe, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Swaziland, Sweden, Switzerland, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Technology Park, Tennessee, Texas, Thailand, The Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste, The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Turks and Caicos Islands, Uganda, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United Republic of Tanzania, United States of America, United States Virgin Islands, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Venezuela, Vermont, Vietnam, Virginia, Wales, West Virginia, Western Africa, Western Asia, Western Europe, Western Sahara,, Yemen, Zambia, Zimbabwe. No Comments

The following article from FacilitiesNet is a great introduction to the use of commercial photovoltaic systems in a business park, or any other facility for that matter.  Building owners can choose between owning the photovoltaic system and signing a power purchase agreement (PPA) under which a third party installs and owns the system, then sells power to the facility.

As Photovoltaic Costs Fall, Demand for Solar Power Rises


By Loren Snyder – December 2011 – Power & Communication

Solar used to be a hard sell. The technology hadn’t matured, the components were expensive, performance was often lackluster and payback periods sometimes progressed at a glacial pace.

But times are a-changin’: Solar is selling. The main drivers of that growth, of course, are financial. Although recent studies from the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory indicate that prices for photovoltaic equipment are generally cheaper on new construction than existing structures, there are enough incentives that facility managers are increasingly turning to solar for existing buildings as well.

According to Lawrence Berkeley, the installed cost of commercial photovoltaic systems completed in 2010 fell by roughly 17 percent when compared to the year before, and fell by an additional 11 percent within the first six months of 2011.

Going Solar?

Facility managers interested in solar power need to determine where best to locate photovoltaic modules and the related components. Ground-mounted modules allow for easy access, but maintenance is minimal for the modules, so access is largely a non-issue. The real benefit of ground-mounted modules is that they can be set up without any kind of structural calculations for an organization’s buildings.

Roof-mounted modules have a distinct set of benefits. Some people don’t like the way solar modules look. If that’s the case, there are few better places to locate panels than on rooftops. The panels usually require little more than an annual cleaning, which can be wrapped into other rooftop maintenance duties.

The Oakland, Calif., plant of Feeney Wire has a 380-panel rooftop photovoltaic array that can produce as much as 90 kilowatts. The array is located on two buildings — one metal structure and one wooden-framed. The system clips cleanly onto the metal roof, while on the wooden structure it is self-ballasting and uses polymer stands that do no damage to the existing roof.

“There was no need for any roof penetrations on the building, except for the main power conduit, so it’s very clean,” says Andy Toimil, vice president of operations at Feeney.

How little maintenance do solar arrays require? Unless an organization is located next to a concrete plant and has to deal with the dust of production, or unless wet autumn weather routinely plasters leaves on the panels, little to no module maintenance is required.

“In most regions the panels are cleaned via Mother Nature,” says Scott Shively, principal with the DLR Group.

It’s easy to know when there’s a problem with the systems. That’s because the amount of electricity produced by the modules is often monitored in real-time, and most facility managers can track production on their computers.

“If a system is not producing, it is known almost immediately and maintenance crews can be sent out,” say Shively. His firm designed the solar arrays at FedEx Field, home to the Washington Redskins. The design uses 8,000 solar panels that also provide covered parking in an 841-car lot, plus 10 electric vehicle-charging stations. The system can generate 11 percent of the facility’s power requirements on game days, and all power needed on non-game days.

For facility managers interested in solar, the starting point, as it is in most situations, is economics. Facility managers should ask the following questions:

  • What does the facility’s load profile look like?
  • What photovoltaic equipment is needed and what will it cost?
  • What electric tariffs apply?
  • Are local or federal incentives available that reduce the up-front costs?

Facility managers can choose between owning the photovoltaic system and signing a power purchase agreement (PPA) under which a third party installs and owns the system, then sells power to the facility. Even though many PPAs specify the third-party is responsible for maintenance and upkeep, the solar arrays still sit on property that’s the responsibility of facility managers, so they should carefully weigh considerations that affect their buildings.

Facility managers should also take a close look at the credentials of the company they plan to work with.

“The best advice I can give facility managers is to diligently check references,” says Shively. “If you are considering entering into a 10-, 15- or 20-year agreement, what assurance are developers or installers giving you they will still be around for the duration of the agreement?”

Shively says he expects that PPAs will begin to shift to other companies to pick up the energy sale agreements and maintenance as many of the solar startups disappear over the next five years.

Assuming, however, that facility managers do their homework, have realistic expectations, conduct their due diligence, and get the engineering go-ahead (both for the structures and the electrical load), solar arrays seem to satisfy.

“All of the work is before the installation,” says Toimil, who spent more than six months doing research and talking with contractors to narrow down what system they wanted and who they were going to award the contract to. All of this work behind him, Toimil is happy with his choice. “I check production every morning when I get in,” he says. “It’s enough ‘juice’ to potentially offset the facility’s entire energy needs.”

Loren Snyder, a contributing editor for Building Operating Management, is a writer who specializes in facility issues. He was formerly managing editor of Building Operating Management.


Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.